semantalytics / awesome-semantic-web

A curated list of various semantic web and linked data resources.
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
1.43k stars 241 forks source link

adding Semantic Arts, the gist ontology, and books on ontology engineering & DCA #132

Closed pwin closed 4 years ago

pwin commented 4 years ago

DCA = data-centric architecture

pwin commented 4 years ago

HI @maximvelsler

Semantic Arts - Enterprise information systems based on flexible data structures and deep semantics. is actually a business that sells products with a primary focus on semantic web technology.

I've made the other changes as suggested

Thanks

@pwin

On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 at 14:49, Maxim Veksler notifications@github.com wrote:

@maximveksler requested changes on this pull request.

Thank you for your contribution, these are meaningful additions. Please address comments before merge.

In README.md https://github.com/semantalytics/awesome-semantic-web/pull/132#discussion_r407200673 :

@@ -199,6 +199,7 @@ Looking for something but can't find it? Add it to the ["Does it exist"](https:/

Companies

Companies or businesses selling products with a primary focus on semantic web technology

+- Semantic Arts - Enterprise information systems based on flexible data structures and deep semantics.

This one belongs to industry, please add it to the bottom of the list.

In README.md https://github.com/semantalytics/awesome-semantic-web/pull/132#discussion_r407200883 :

+- The Data-Centric Revolution +- Ontology Engineering

Thank you for the contribution, please use append() to existing list.

In README.md https://github.com/semantalytics/awesome-semantic-web/pull/132#discussion_r407200969 :

@@ -594,6 +596,7 @@ OS - OpenSource

Ontologies

+- gist - minimalist enterprise upper ontology - max coverage, fewest primitives, least ambiguity.

Thank you for the contribution, please use append() to existing list.

In README.md https://github.com/semantalytics/awesome-semantic-web/pull/132#discussion_r407200973 :

@@ -464,6 +465,7 @@ ARCHIVE - inactive projects or old academic projects that may lack soruce code

Blogs

+- Semantic Arts Data-Centric Architecture blog

Thank you for the contribution, please use append() to existing list.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/semantalytics/awesome-semantic-web/pull/132#pullrequestreview-391859089, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIFYTGDLS2VBPP34J72FTTRMHBHRANCNFSM4MCBEJ2Q .

maximveksler commented 4 years ago

@pwin it might be that the applied changes were not pushed? I don't I seem them in the PR.

Under companies we prefer to have business that contribute to the development of semantic web technologies, I kindly request that your listing be appended to the enterprise section.

pwin commented 4 years ago

Hi Maxim Semantic arts do develop semantic technologies. The company develops and maintains an upper ontology for enterprise data, and it also is developing products for constructing and maintaining a model driven data centric architecture That's why I was suggesting that it should be listed in that place Cheers Peter

On Thu, 16 Apr 2020, 17:09 Maxim Veksler, notifications@github.com wrote:

@pwin https://github.com/pwin it might be that the applied changes were not pushed? I don't I seem them in the PR.

Under companies we prefer to have business that contribute to the development of semantic web technologies, I kindly request that your listing be appended to the enterprise section.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/semantalytics/awesome-semantic-web/pull/132#issuecomment-614746942, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIFYTBXS6J545M7MT5G3VLRM4USVANCNFSM4MCBEJ2Q .

zacharywhitley commented 4 years ago

It's not a perfect distinction between companies and industry. The idea was to identify that some companies were using semantic web technologies but where their main purpose was something else like manufacturing cars, banking, etc. There's obviously some overlap. If you are representing your company I would defer to listing it where you'd like but ask that it only be listed in one or the other and not both.

pwin commented 4 years ago

afaik it is only in the Companies section