Closed BOberreither closed 10 months ago
Anyway, don't push a new version of your xslt, let's first compare results of the current and a possible new transformation. So we don't add any bugs or delete stuff we need.
ok, let's do this together in the office.
Added a new
This item from ...additional_info.xml is treated correctly:
The referred-to-entity is
https://sk.acdh.oeaw.ac.at/DWbibl04100/passage/0
(correct).While this item and some others are treated wrongly:
Here, the referred to entity is
https://sk.acdh.oeaw.ac.at/DWbibl00555/passage/0
. So the base-ID is taken from@source
, although there is a@wholeText="yes"
. One correct version would be, like above, to take the base-ID from @refBase in these cases.With the xPath
//info[@wholeText="yes" and @refInt!="no" and @refLevel="no"]
you can find the one correct and nine wrong items. Is there a specific rule for this xPath? If not, in which other rules are they treated (and why in different ones)?Anyway, don't push a new version of your xslt, let's first compare results of the current and a possible new transformation. So we don't add any bugs or delete stuff we need.