Closed uscholdm closed 1 month ago
@uscholdm I think we can fast-track this; it's hard to see anyone objecting. Do you want to take it on?
Sure
There is nothing to do here. I was apparently looking at an old version of gist.
There is nothing to do here. I was apparently looking at an old version of gist.
c
Having hard time closing it as non planned.
The range of
gist:atDateTime
isxsd:dateTime
but there are a bunch of restrictions that userdfs:Literal
as the local range. For example:gist:startDateTime exactly 1 rdfs:Literal
I propose that all such occurrences of
rdfs:Literal
be changed toxsd:dateTime
.See also #1132