search

semanticarts / gist

Semantic Arts gist upper enterprise ontology
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
164 stars 18 forks source link

Add dct:license #593

Open Jamie-SA opened 3 years ago

Jamie-SA commented 3 years ago

Minor request, the website https://archivo.dbpedia.org/rating gives stars to ontology ratings based on having this property point to a URI, and preferably to a resolvable license.

★ License (I & II)

The second and third star are granted for proper and clear license statements and are tested with the Archivo SHACL Library.

License I grants a star for a huge variety of license statements, i.e. when a license is given, but consumers need to spend extra integration effort to understand and use it (cf. License I SHACL test).

License II grants a star for a homogenized license statement: 1. using the property dct:license and a URI as object. (cf. License II SHACL test).

Dave said we should add it.

uscholdm commented 1 year ago

@Jamie-SA, @rjyounes We currently have:

gist:license
    a owl:AnnotationProperty ;
    rdfs:isDefinedBy <https://w3id.org/semanticarts/ontology/gistCore> ;
    skos:definition "An annotation for providing the licensing on this or derivative ontologies"^^xsd:string ;
    skos:prefLabel "license"^^xsd:string ;
    .

Dave said he want us to use dct:license to improve gist's rating. We should discuss this.

NOTE: this is subsumed by #161 and relevant to #31, #155, #389

rjyounes commented 1 year ago

dcterms is an RDF ontology and therefore will make gist non-DL compliant if we use it. (Also, the property suggests a range of dcterms:LicenseDocument, thus expected use is as an object property (though still not technically an owl:ObjectProperty). We could accommodate this by putting the license on our website, but it's a moot issue for the first reason given.

I suggest closing this issue for the same reason we closed #155.