search

semaphoreui / semaphore

Modern UI and powerful API for Ansible, Terraform, OpenTofu, PowerShell and other DevOps tools.
https://semaphoreui.com
MIT License
10.73k stars 1.07k forks source link

Survey Variables #904

Closed jhaesselbacher closed 6 months ago

jhaesselbacher commented 2 years ago

For Survey Variables when editing a template, it is possible to provide a Type multiple choice list for string or integer ? Multiple choice options with a single selection for the variable ? it is also possible to provide a minimum and maximum number of characters when user entering the string ? it is also possible to provide for entering a password type variable for which the characters will be masked ?

Twim4 commented 2 years ago

Would be interested in that too. To have more types of surveys

AndrewSav commented 2 years ago

Yep, I would also like to indicate that this is the top feature on my list missing. Static surveys would be an improvement, but dynamic surveys, a-la rundeck would be ideal.

fiftin commented 2 years ago

Yep, I would also like to indicate that this is the top feature on my list missing. Static surveys would be an improvement, but dynamic surveys, a-la rundeck would be ideal.

What is dynamic surveys? I didn't use Rundeck.

AndrewSav commented 2 years ago

@fiftin Something like this and this The entire page is actually relevant as a primer what a more advanced survey interface can achieve. Also "Cascading Remote Options" section a bit further down is of a particular interest to me.

In short, you can fetch options and their possible value from remote URLs and you can have selection of options/answers depending on the values entered by the user for other options.

Sohn123 commented 2 years ago

A static multiple choice option would be really great.

ySp-chld commented 1 year ago

This issue seems to have a lot of traction and several people liked to have some better survey variable see #1157 Also i'd add maybe if variable is empty having a default value would be great.

AndrewSav commented 1 year ago

@SupremeGit, first of all no one owes you anything here, if you chose to waste your time attempting to use something you cannot use, this is on you. You are receiving free software with no obligations whatsoever, take it or leave it.

With this out of the way, if you care about a feature you are interested in being added at all coming here and insulting the very people who can make it happen is counterproductive. Do you think they will read what you wrote and think: "Jeez, this guy is so right we totally suck, we need to drop everything right now and work on this as a first priority, to redeem somewhat the fact that our software is completely useless!"? I can assure you this is not going to happen.

Why is this request being ignored?

That's really simple. It is an open source project, where things are getting done by people contributing their time to move it forward. No one has chosen to contribute their time towards this feature so far, this is why it has not been done yet.

ianpogi5 commented 1 year ago

anyone working on this?

sparsick commented 1 year ago

Hi,

I create a PR #1598 for the use case "hiding passwords"

fiftin commented 6 months ago

Done