Open chbrown opened 7 years ago
More gripes:
ExPex treats \label{}
as non-space; e.g.,
\ex\label{main}
Hello
\xe
Gets an ugly extra space at the beginning; to get this to render properly (as if there was no \label{}
), it should be:
\ex\label{main}%
Hello
\xe
\ex
vs. \pex
for examples-without-subparts and examples-with-subparts? Other example typesetting libraries disambiguate / automatically adjust, no problem. Don't Make Me Think.texdoc expex
manual is 82 pages long. It's. not. that. hard.\pex[labeltype=roman]
is broken; the subexamples start numbering from (ii). Other labeltype
values work just fine, starting at 1, a, etc.
\documentclass{article}
document produces a different result than is shown there:
5/25/2017 v5.1b ExPex linguistics example formatter (JF)
(which has been out for a while)
Or at least strongly recommend using
gb4e-emulate
orlinguex
.ExPex is powerful, partly due to it doing everything its own way (for example, references), but that means it's easy to break from the standard aesthetic.
List of grievances:
\ref{}
erencing properly (#14)\lingset{exnotype=roman}
, but references to these examples use the default arabic numbering (for both\ex
and\pex
root level examples, as well as\pex ... \a
subexamples)