Closed ramonski closed 8 months ago
I would rather stick to the distinct numbers instead of a bar with a variable width to have it more intuitive for the user. In the progress bar approach (although I like the design), it would be also difficult to display if e.g. 10/10 verified, but not published. Is the published bar then invisible? Does it show half/half? Do the other bars disappear? Therefore, I guess we should keep it as simple as possible.
I guess a usable solution could be to use the progress bar styling and apply 25%
per part. Would you prefer this styling?
I guess a usable solution could be to use the progress bar styling and apply
25%
per part. Would you prefer this styling?
I like it more than simply the numbers, yes. At least it becomes more "easy" to get the point on a quick look
Ok, then I'll change it to this styling.
I changed it now to the progress bar style and chose the same width as our current %-progress:
The mousover help text is still possible
I tested the brown "sample received" background for the first number, but it looked a bit sh***y
Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses
This PR improves the "Number of Analyses" column info in the sample listing:
Current behavior before PR
Only verified and total number was displayed
Desired behavior after PR is merged
Number of analyses are displayed as: Open / To be verified / Verified / Total
An info is displayed when moving the mouse over the number and the same color codes as the WF states are used.
I confirm I have tested this PR thoroughly and coded it according to PEP8 and Plone's Python styleguide standards.