Closed 0xtavian closed 4 years ago
Which sub command are you referring to? scan
has the --no-http
and --no-https
flags as it prepends by default. file
takes URLs from a file you provide so it didn't make sense to add it there and single
is a URL you provide, so it also did not make sense to me there.
Im referring to the sub command file
. prepending http + https to every request is preferable when dealing with any list consisting of IP:PORT. Its easy to export IP:PORT from other tools but prepending http/s is essential when taking screen shots.
Makes sense! At the moment the file
sub command assumes URL's are provided. Will tag this as an enhancement. In the interim I guess one can generate a quick list with some bash one-liners.
Right! With Eyewitness they have a --prepend-https
flag that prepends http+https to every request so it makes it simple! Granted, with that feature in this circumstance you have to deal with 50%+ pages possibly being errors but IMO its worth it!!!
Dont get me wrong, i love the way you guys deal with errors! so u might as well prepend http and https to every request!
and then sort, like what was mentioned here https://github.com/sensepost/gowitness/issues/12 ok /end rant.
thanks guys!
gowitness should have the option of prepending http/s like eyewitness does.