Closed LiUzHiAn closed 2 years ago
Besides, the testing normal videos seem not to be used.
you're right. I only used 140 because I wanted to calculate AUC using sklearn. If all the remaining 10 normal videos are calculated, the AUC is 86. The code can be easily modified.
Have you ever tried to evaluate the AUC of all the videos at once?
To be more specific, suppose we have 3 test videos with 1000 frames each. And the first video is normal, the rest two are abnormal ones. You should contact the gt_labels and predicted scores of all three videos and use sklearn to calculate the AUC. What is the result then?
Thx.
Can you please tell me How to add evaluate this model , Auc curve code of this model
Thanks for helping
@LiUzHiAn I tried your way, and the AUC is not identical but about the same.
@seominseok0429 What training parameters did you use? I got AUC=0.82, but 0.845. Thanks.
Ours full code available at CODE
Is your evaluation strategy the same as the official?
I notice you average the AUCs of 140 testing abnormal videos. If I didn't remember wrong, the official calculated the whole videos at the same time.