Closed dlecocq closed 10 years ago
This was so that we could detect the case where a worker that owns a job is the one that's invoking the 'put'. In that case, we'd like to avoid sending the lock lost message since presumably it knows that it has moved the job.
Thanks, @dlecocq!
This was so that we could detect the case where a worker that owns a job is the one that's invoking the 'put'. In that case, we'd like to avoid sending the lock lost message since presumably it knows that it has moved the job.