Closed seperman closed 2 months ago
Attention: Patch coverage is 86.00000%
with 21 lines
in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 96.70%. Comparing base (
be22027
) to head (3228f4b
).
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
deepdiff/distance.py | 70.27% | 11 Missing :warning: |
deepdiff/diff.py | 89.79% | 5 Missing :warning: |
deepdiff/deephash.py | 86.20% | 4 Missing :warning: |
deepdiff/lfucache.py | 50.00% | 1 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
With the introduction of
threshold_to_diff_deeper
, the values returned are different than in previous versions of DeepDiff. You can still get the older values by settingthreshold_to_diff_deeper=0
. However to signify that enough has changed in this release that the users need to update the parameters passed to DeepDiff, we will be doing a major version update.use_enum_value=True
makes it so when diffing enum, we use the enum's value. It makes it so comparing an enum to a string or any other value is not reported as a type change.threshold_to_diff_deeper=float
is a number between 0 and 1. When comparing dictionaries that have a small intersection of keys, we will report the dictionary as anew_value
instead of reporting individual keys changed. If you set it to zero, you get the same results as DeepDiff 7.0.1 and earlier, which means this feature is disabled. The new default is 0.33 which means if less that one third of keys between dictionaries intersect, report it as a new object.ordered-set
and switched toorderly-set
. Theordered-set
package was not being maintained anymore and starting Python 3.6, there were better options for sets that ordered. I forked one of the new implementations, modified it, and published it asorderly-set
.use_log_scale:bool
andlog_scale_similarity_threshold:float
. They can be used to ignore small changes in numbers by comparing their differences in logarithmic space. This is different than ignoring the difference based on significant digits.iterable_compare_func
is used.