Closed MattWindsor91 closed 8 years ago
Looks good but there are conflicts with master. @CaptainHayashi could you fix these?
@septract On it, might take a while (these are fairly nontrivial!).
@septract I've rebased on top of master (you might have to pull --force
to check out locally). This should mean there aren't any conflicts.
This large PRQ non-exhaustively does the following:
1) Annotates most of the top-level definitions in Starling with types (I didn't quite get everything covered); 2) Moves some definitions to nest inside top-level definitions; 3) Replaces
ViewDef
withViewDefiner
a modifiedFuncTable
(now calledFuncDefiner
); 4) Kills off some type synonyms; 5) Generally refactors various parts of Starling.