Currently, for authors to be able to respond to our comments, we need to send the list back to them and thus end up with the list in draft status again. When this happens for corrections/edits to be made by the contributors, it's fine and necessary. But if we just require confirmation of a minor change before endorsement, then the entire list is sent back to draft status, and they need to resubmit it, which removes the check marks in the curator box to show we completed nomenclature and genomics review (even though it is still recorded in the correspondence box - this might be confusing), and then their list joins the back of the queue on the dashboard.
Currently, for authors to be able to respond to our comments, we need to send the list back to them and thus end up with the list in draft status again. When this happens for corrections/edits to be made by the contributors, it's fine and necessary. But if we just require confirmation of a minor change before endorsement, then the entire list is sent back to draft status, and they need to resubmit it, which removes the check marks in the curator box to show we completed nomenclature and genomics review (even though it is still recorded in the correspondence box - this might be confusing), and then their list joins the back of the queue on the dashboard.