Closed Irallia closed 1 year ago
Base: 98.47% // Head: 98.47% // No change to project coverage :thumbsup:
Coverage data is based on head (
8ce2c38
) compared to base (a866074
). Patch has no changes to coverable lines.
:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
@Irallia am I seeing that vaquita-LR performs that much worse when combining long and short reads?
@Irallia am I seeing that vaquita-LR performs that much worse when combining long and short reads?
It performs relly bad with my S1 (short read) dataset, and just a bit better when adding the long reads. With the long reads allone its okayish. Can you have a look at the workflow if I call it in a wrong way? Btw I had to remove the polishing because I ran into an error.
I will do some simulations next, lets see how it performs there...
@joshuak94 here you see the long read results compared with other long read callers: https://github.com/seqan/iGenVar/pull/228
I also saw that Vaquita-LR does not call any Insertions?
@joshuak94 Now the plot looks better:
See plots and: