Motif naming is inconsistent with subtype naming.
For example for 3 subtypes, naming is: subtype 0,1,2
Motif naming is 1,2,3 in the chexmix.experiment.transfac file
I also believe that motif naming is unlinked to subtype naming. For example, if subtype 0 and 2 have motifs, but subtype 1 does not the motifs are labeled 1 and 2. So there is no easy way to link the raw PWM back to the subtypes reported in the HTML.
Motif naming is inconsistent with subtype naming. For example for 3 subtypes, naming is: subtype 0,1,2 Motif naming is 1,2,3 in the chexmix.experiment.transfac file
I also believe that motif naming is unlinked to subtype naming. For example, if subtype 0 and 2 have motifs, but subtype 1 does not the motifs are labeled 1 and 2. So there is no easy way to link the raw PWM back to the subtypes reported in the HTML.