This is all pretty minor, but still makes for a less than ideal read:
It seems the one making the GitHub description is not aware that it is also the one used in Docker Hub... At least it makes for a more-than-silly reading at the registry; mentioning master (This one is silly in GitHub as well, though), half the description is about building the image, and it mentions that if you want it simple, head over to the Docker Hub register... Where the user already is.
Wouldn't it make more sense to either make the GH description generic enough to not be a mess at the Docker Hub, or make specific description for the Hub.
This is all pretty minor, but still makes for a less than ideal read: It seems the one making the GitHub description is not aware that it is also the one used in Docker Hub... At least it makes for a more-than-silly reading at the registry; mentioning master (This one is silly in GitHub as well, though), half the description is about building the image, and it mentions that if you want it simple, head over to the Docker Hub register... Where the user already is.
Wouldn't it make more sense to either make the GH description generic enough to not be a mess at the Docker Hub, or make specific description for the Hub.