Closed winding-lines closed 8 years ago
Glad that this is the behaviour you expect, but I don't understand what you mean by forwarding namespaces. Could you elaborate? Note: I have never used namespaces in xml.
I took that expression from the lexer. There is a comment about forwarding the namespace.
I think that all the schemas could be used to generate the rust code, instead of the programmer writing them manually. I believe that this is how some of the Java implementations are working. I do not need that feature for this one project and it is unclear to me how popular it is to generate code from xml schema nowadays.
This PR just documents the way it works now, I frequently look at tests when the documentation is not clear on a specific point.
What is your take on xml schemas?
On Jan 31, 2016, at 1:09 AM, Oliver Schneider notifications@github.com wrote:
Glad that this is the behaviour you expect, but I don't understand what you mean by forwarding namespaces. Could you elaborate? Note: I have never used namespaces in xml.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
FYI, I am trying to write a graphml parser, on top of serde-xml - thanks for your work on this!
Right now I am still trying to get the tests to pass.
Haha ok. Good that I know what I wrote..I'm not a fan of schemas, they are underdefined and there are too many incompatible implementations.
Cool project. Let me know if you need anything from serde-xml
This is documenting the current behavior of forwarded namespaces, my code depends on it and I want to make sure this is the right approach.