Closed lilitkarapetyan closed 5 days ago
@lilitkarapetyan @IanMayo I see the failed tests then I checkout and check from my side. I can run pass without any issue. So I re-run the job and the tests from deployment are also passed. The failed test before maybe from low connection. But I don't know what I should check in this PR. From UI, seems everything is working as before.
But I don't know what I should check in this PR. From UI, seems everything is working as before.
Hello @Tristina1788 - this is a code change that should not change the UI functionality. So, everything should work as before - so that's a good sign :-)
We have these build errors @lilitkarapetyan. I tried the apply the suggested fix, but I don't think it worked:
src/ActionsAndReducers/dbMessageTypes/messageTypes_ActionCreators.ts(3,19): error TS7016: Could not find a declaration file for module 'check-types'. '/tmp/build_0e601687/client/node_modules/check-types/src/check-types.js' implicitly has an 'any' type.
Try `npm i --save-dev @types/check-types` if it exists or add a new declaration (.d.ts) file containing `declare module 'check-types';`
src/ActionsAndReducers/dbMessages/messages_ActionCreators.ts(4,19): error TS7016: Could not find a declaration file for module 'check-types'. '/tmp/build_0e601687/client/node_modules/check-types/src/check-types.js' implicitly has an 'any' type.
Try `npm i --save-dev @types/check-types` if it exists or add a new declaration (.d.ts) file containing `declare module 'check-types';`
I'll have to leave it to you, please.
We have these build errors @lilitkarapetyan. I tried the apply the suggested fix, but I don't think it worked:
src/ActionsAndReducers/dbMessageTypes/messageTypes_ActionCreators.ts(3,19): error TS7016: Could not find a declaration file for module 'check-types'. '/tmp/build_0e601687/client/node_modules/check-types/src/check-types.js' implicitly has an 'any' type. Try `npm i --save-dev @types/check-types` if it exists or add a new declaration (.d.ts) file containing `declare module 'check-types';` src/ActionsAndReducers/dbMessages/messages_ActionCreators.ts(4,19): error TS7016: Could not find a declaration file for module 'check-types'. '/tmp/build_0e601687/client/node_modules/check-types/src/check-types.js' implicitly has an 'any' type. Try `npm i --save-dev @types/check-types` if it exists or add a new declaration (.d.ts) file containing `declare module 'check-types';`
I'll have to leave it to you, please.
I will solove it
Did you run the yarn command ?
Did you run the yarn command ?
The error comes from the Heroku build, not my local machine. Running yarn install
locally fixed my build, but we need the Heroku build to run, too.
Hello @lilitkarapetyan - this is done, really. But, how about you try to remove some other ts-ignore
comments in the code base, too?
Hello @lilitkarapetyan - this is done, really. But, how about you try to remove some other
ts-ignore
comments in the code base, too?
I Think It's good Idea
This is good work, thanks @lilitkarapetyan
It seems to cover quite a wide area, so it's worth @Tristina1788 doing some wider testing. @lilitkarapetyan - could you please provide a list of areas of Serge that should be re-tested due to changes in this PR?
This is good work, thanks @lilitkarapetyan
It seems to cover quite a wide area, so it's worth @Tristina1788 doing some wider testing. @lilitkarapetyan - could you please provide a list of areas of Serge that should be re-tested due to changes in this PR?
Hello , I think you could test keeping the Forces Save section in the admin panel and the Chanel tab in the game.
@IanMayo @lilitkarapetyan Checking all places and I don't see the difference with before.
I don't see the difference with before.
Good, that's what we're hoping to see π€£ . Lilit has done some tidying (refactoring) of the source code for Serge, but the test is that nothing has been broken. So, that's what we're looking for @Tristina1788 .
@IanMayo @lilitkarapetyan Checking all places and I don't see the difference with before.
Yes, we need it to work like before.
I don't see the difference with before.
Good, that's what we're hoping to see π€£ . Lilit has done some tidying (refactoring) of the source code for Serge, but the test is that nothing has been broken. So, that's what we're looking for @Tristina1788 .
Yes, I understand that. So It's good to go.
Fixes #2769
π§° Issue
π Overview:
π Link to preview
π€ Reason:
π¨Work carried out:
π₯οΈ Screenshot
Confirmations
π Developer Notes: