Thank you for all the amazing job done with SixLabors.ImageSharp. I personally love this library and level of the compatibility with System.Drawing.* libraries.
I am the maintainer of Clippit (fork of Open-Xml-PowerTools) that was migrated to .NET 6 and System.Drawing layer replaced by SixLabors.ImageSharp libraries.
I would love to keep this library under MIT license and consume the latest versions of ImageSharp.
Works in Source or Object form are licensed to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 if.
- You are consuming the Work in for use in software licensed under an Open Source or Source Available license.
- You are consuming the Work as a Transitive Package Dependency.
I read it as that consumers of this library (who do not directly reference SixLabors.ImageSharp) can use it commercially without buying the Six Labors Commercial License.
Can you please confirm that I understand it correctly?
Hi @JimBobSquarePants
Thank you for all the amazing job done with
SixLabors.ImageSharp
. I personally love this library and level of the compatibility withSystem.Drawing.*
libraries.I am the maintainer of
Clippit
(fork of Open-Xml-PowerTools) that was migrated to.NET 6
andSystem.Drawing
layer replaced bySixLabors.ImageSharp
libraries.I would love to keep this library under
MIT
license and consume the latest versions ofImageSharp
.From what I see in Six Labors Split License it is perfectly legal to use case:
I read it as that consumers of this library (who do not directly reference
SixLabors.ImageSharp
) can use it commercially without buying the Six Labors Commercial License.Can you please confirm that I understand it correctly?