Closed nblumhardt closed 5 years ago
Any thoughts on this, @serilog/reviewers-core ?
LGTM ! 👍
I see it as extremely tempting to make them extension methods , but I suppose that YAGNI tells me that NO 🤷♂
(and if we were to do it, should the namespace be any different ? 🤔 )
I thought about this, but came out on the side of restraint since usage will be very, very infrequent (as far as I can tell). Extension methods do bring all kinds of namespace pollution concerns into the picture :-) .. Might just side-step that and :shipit:
Thanks for the review, BTW! :-)
when will this feature be released?
@xrkolovos thanks for the nudge; no plan yet, but https://github.com/serilog/serilog-extensions-logging/pull/145 is the PR to watch.
If there's any library where this belongs, I guess it's here. Resolves #81.
No tests, as they'd be pretty much an exact copy of the already-declarative code.