Closed vrom911 closed 6 years ago
@vrom911 I agree! This should have been done long ago... But I think there're a lot of usages of putText
currently and a lot of code can become broken :disappointed: I don't see how we can perform migration to save old behavior and also have consistent naming. But I think we really should have putText
and putTextLn
, because current naming is far from perfect :sob:
@ChShersh, it's really sad..(
Probably we could name the new one as putTextInline
then, so there won't be any conflicts? Or any other more suitable alternative?
universum-1.0.0
😉
@gromakovsky I want #5 be done before releasing universum-1.0.0
.. And probably something else before we will announce universum
.
So the solution is:
putText
to putTextLn
putText
whish is equsl to putStr
.
For the moment there is only
putText
function inuniversum
which behaves likeputStrLn
. I think it would be convenient to haveputText
which would be specialized version ofputStr
andputTextLn
— version ofputStrLn
.