Closed hughsaffar closed 8 years ago
I'm wondering if it's better or not to replace the scheme instead of using both of scheme and type.
I think too. It's not good. Because it will break backwards compatibility. I think it would be better to add a method setType() instead of changing the constructor.
Changing the constructor is not a problem, the library is still in alpha, there is no backward compatibility awareness for the moment , it's rather that the scheme is irelevent in case of sock proxy
It will be more better than new method.
I merge and I will bring further changes
Integrated Proxy Type (SOCKS4 and SOCKS5)