Finishing up Sprint 4 - Githubissues

Check out the reviews from Sprint 2 and 3:

FROM SPRINT 3 SAD Document:

[ ] The domain model seems to be incomplete/not include the useful information (no package information). There is no description for the domain model. Ref
[ ] The class diagram should be in the Development view. The description is too general
[x] Incorrect diagram label (2 Figure 13)
[ ] The first Figure 13, no explanation for Elastic container service cluster. Is this specific for AWS, or it's a common service that has a different name in AWS? This diagram should be in the Deployment view
[x] The second Figure 13, no server information in the Deployment diagram. There is no description too.
[x] The Package diagram should be in the logical view.
[ ] The sequence diagrams seem to be incorrect (the lifetime of the process)
[ ] Wrong notation for Use-case diagrams
[x] Why 3.10 sources in Bibliography section

FROM SPRINT 2 SAD Document:

[x] Weird format in ToC
[ ] Weird format throughout the documents. Your team needs to be more careful before submitting the document.
[ ] The domain model seems to be incomplete/not include the useful information (no package information). There is no description for the domain model.
[ ] The class diagram should be in the Development view. The description is too general
[x] Incorrect diagram label (2 Figure 13)
[ ] The first Figure 13, no explanation for Elastic container service cluster. Is this specific for AWS, or it's a common service that has a different name in AWS? This diagram should be in the Deployment view
[ ] The second Figure 13, no server information in the Deployment diagram. There is no description too.
[x] The Package diagram should be in the logical view.
[ ] The sequence diagrams seem to be incorrect (the lifetime of the process)
[ ] Wrong notation for Use-case diagrams
[x] Why 3.10 sources in Bibliography section

FROM SPRINT 3 Risk Management Plan

[x] The revision number seems inconsistent with the tagged use (v1.1). I don't understand what is late Version 11/30/06
[x] There are 2 table 3.
[x] The second table 3 should be on a single page.
[x] The list of risks should be in a separate document, preferably Excel or OpenDocument Spreadsheet format.

FROM SPRINT 2 Risk Management Plan

[x] The revision number seems inconsistent with the tagged use (v1.1). I don't understand what is late Version 11/30/06
[x] Table 3 should be on a single page
[x] The list of risks should be in a separate document, preferably Excel or OpenDocument Spreadsheet format.

FROM SPRINT 2+3 Test Plan

[x] Version is still 1.0
[ ] Extremely high code coverage planned. You need to make sure you can achieve this target when submitting your deliverable.

serum-390 / soen390-team16-godzilla