config: rmv Adguard combined disguised trackers

[SpencerIsGiddy]

I was doing some thinking and maybe adguard cname blocklist should not be with adguard sdns since there is a higher chance for false positives and you mentioned in the past that serverless dns already uncloaks cnames anyways. So it seems like a good idea to remove this list from sdns

[ignoramous]

Does leaving it in affect blocking adversely? If not, it is okay to leave it as-is, I feel.

[SpencerIsGiddy]

Does leaving it in affect blocking adversely? If not, it is okay to leave it as-is, I feel.

I have seen people say there are some false positives with the list. https://github.com/AdguardTeam/cname-trackers/issues/62

maybe we can switch it out for this https://github.com/AdguardTeam/cname-trackers/blob/master/combined_original_trackers.txt

[ignoramous]

maybe we can switch it out for this https://github.com/AdguardTeam/cname-trackers/blob/master/combined_original_trackers.txt

This one contains the cname + AdGuard orig list?

[SpencerIsGiddy]

maybe we can switch it out for this https://github.com/AdguardTeam/cname-trackers/blob/master/combined_original_trackers.txt

This one contains the cname + AdGuard orig list?

I think it just uses the cname list but this is probably the list meant for blocklists capable of scanning CNAME records unlike the current one which is very general

[ignoramous]

Hm, that list has like 10 to 20 entries only

[ignoramous]

Is the current commit good to be merged?

[SpencerIsGiddy]

Is the current commit good to be merged?

Sure!

[ignoramous]

Thanks (again).

[SpencerIsGiddy]

Thanks (again).

😁👍