Closed Manishearth closed 1 year ago
I think as far as review is concerned I will be satisfied with one review (from @eggrobin or otherwise) on the algorithm, and also I'd like @sffc or @echeran to look at the data model. Also fine with landing this with algorithm review and an understanding that we won't cut a release until someone has had a look at the data model.
Mostly because this PR is getting big and I already have another PR built on in (#91) plus a complicated fix (#92) that I don't want to keep rebasing.
Fixes #3
This was a bit tricky to pin down in the details because of some stuff which I plan to file an issue about.
This does require new data, but it isn't a breaking change in the non-
hardcoded-data
mode because the added trait method falls back to the relatively small amount of hardcoded bidi pair data.There's a bunch of complicated comments about
processed_class
iteration, related to https://github.com/servo/unicode-bidi/issues/86. They're not quite accurate now that I have done the analysis in #86, but they're still potentially relevant.This can be reviewed commit by commit.
r? @eggrobin or @sffc or @mbrubeck