Closed sethmlarson closed 7 years ago
Wow, good spot! I'm happy to go with MIT all the way. If you have a counter recommendation I'd be happy to take that onboard too?
I would actually recommend Apache-2.0. It's MIT with an additional provision to protect against malicious patent stuff. It's a more modern take on liberal open source licensing.
Great! Let's go apache-2.0 👍 (I'm a licensing noob).
You can read here about Apache-2.0. I know as much about licensing as this page knows about licensing. :P I'll send a PR fixing up LICENSE
.
Just noticed this difference while looking at
setup.py
. Withinsetup.py
it seems that the package is licensed underApache-2.0
but looking at the contents ofLICENSE
it shows that the package is licensed underMIT
.Which of these is correct? When that's determined the other should be fixed. cc: @mjdorma