Open ceesem opened 3 months ago
Not a bad idea. Are there any other +
types? Should I just selectively delete middleauth+
or be more generic?
I wouldn't delete the middleauth+
per se, but rather treat it as an explicit indication to use the CAVE token header. We actually have one case where we have imagery that's behind authentication, and the Neuroglancer cloudpath is precomputed://middleauth+https://
. It would actually be perfect if that that indicated how to add the correct header information.
Can you share that image case with me? I would like to see if I can get it to work.
As part of the development of graphene integration in Neuroglancer, the auth protocol is provided to neuroglancer as an additional scheme:
graphene://middleauth+https://
instead of justgraphene://https://
. Currently, however that gives the error:For convenience in coming to cloudvolume from neuroglancer, it would be nice if this multi-scheme URL were acceptable and treated as equivalent to
graphene://https://
.