Closed askiefer closed 7 years ago
Actually this isn't done yet - I see some UI issues on larger screen - so disregard for now
Re: Ammon's comment in the latest email thread: I would expect #1 to be there best performing but the sort just goes numerically ascending according to whatever the building's property is. This gets done in the function rankBuildings()
We should probably change it so #1 is the"best"
I added a few changes related to issue 57. It's just a hack to update the reference for 2016, so it doesn't really close the issue but needs to be included for the current release.
Removed changes from this branch, will submit separate PR.
Addresses issue #72
Lmk if you think this text sounds good or could use editing.