Open Sergey-Litvinenko opened 8 years ago
@Sergey-Litvinenko I definitely agree, we should better utilize the page title and make it consistent. I'll take a pass at this.
There are some machinations in the works to revise the way the projects are presented, but I agree we should give this page a polishing. At the least, it does sort them from based on activity (most recent activity to least). I'll add AdoptADrain now while I'm thinking about it.
http://codeforsanfrancisco.org/projects/
Note: Title says - Our Projects, it is better if it's more descriptive:
or something of that nature that is human and machine readable and keyword reach.
Note:
Description is identical across all urls, it should be page specific. In this tag you usually describe your page as it will come up as url description in SERPs
Note: You list your project in a very chaotic manner. You should use "screen real estate" (visible part of the screen without scrolling) for the most important projects that you are proud of. Inactive projects should not be on this page at all. Also note that Adopt A Drain is not on that list.
Note: It is better to have project specific pages so a visitor stays on your website while getting more info on the project. (open to discussion, has to do with visitor retention and keeping link juice)