Closed rajpara11 closed 4 years ago
Ok I was able to reproduce what Alton was doing with public data. What I had to do was
Doing this method I was able to get the project Alton showed us in the 2/13 meeting with block lot 3456002 that when you sum up has 251 units. Unfortunately I can't find this project in other data sources easily so not sure how to verify that this actually gives us a correct number. I'll mess with newer projects and see if I can verify data another way
Alton's updated email says:
1. Associate mapblocklot data to PTS by joining against Parcels data set (translates block lot to map block lot)
2. Group all permits where filed_date, mapblocklot and proposed_use is the same
3. Filter permits that are permit type 1, 2 or 3 with net_units > 0
4. Only take the first when there are duplicate permit_numbers (first of series of building permit numbers)
5. Remove permits with status ‘withdrawn’ or ‘cancelled’
NOTE: This issue is just a stream of consciousness dump as I work through this issue in the data, actual work that has to be done as part of this has been filed as separate issues.
Alton brought up in our 2/13 meeting with Planning that he uses this method to group permits from PTS that are related to the same 'project'.
This means he assumes there is only 1 project per unique mapblocklot+filed_date combo. Ideally we should just mirror what he is doing (maybe) and do the same thing. I'll run some queries on PTS and see if I see any issues with this approach.