Closed klausriede closed 1 month ago
They are with the subspecies Acrotylus insubricus insubricus.
I see . seems the female neotype is missing http://orthoptera.archive.speciesfile.org/Common/basic/Taxa.aspx?ExpandImages=1 but no, it appears below, under specimen. Should be under types . Schmiddt misspelled
I corrected Schmidt's name at the male neotype:
The neoallotype appears below under normal specimens, since TaxonWorks doesn't recognize allotypes.
@LocoDelAssembly How could you train Taxonworks to "recognize" any types? I think this is a question of database design, in any case any type is not a normal specimen.
We explicitly only cover governed types in the semantics of our TypeMaterial model. Adding logic to the other 80+ is beyond our scope. To add other types of types you can extend a project with Tags or Data attributes.
what do you mean by governed types? Name-bearing types?
governed types?
I should have said governed type types. I.e. the type types that have nomenclatural consequences (Holotype, Paratype, etc.). The specimen classified as an "genotype", "typotype", or "homeotype" for example, has no special nomenclatural bearing. There are no rules about these type types in the ICZN.
ok, name bearing types. Now this is the opposite case: a (neo)type assigned posthoc isntit? So in this case we should know who did this, when and eventually why. As far as I understand there must not be a publication associated to such an act.
PS it appears under neosyntype in old OSF http://orthoptera.archive.speciesfile.org/Common/specimen/ShowSpecimen.aspx?SpecimenID=83709
https://orthoptera.speciesfile.org/otus/810739/overview -many pictures available!