Closed klausriede closed 2 months ago
In this case there seems to be a mistake. Letana atomifera (Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1878), described as Pyrrhicia atomifera, is based on at least two syntypes from India, which should be in Vienna.
Sigfrid Ingrisch's specimen from Nepal is not a type. It's in alcohol and perhaps not photographed. I added it to OSF.
I will ask sigfrid about this and the other SESAM data....seems nobody is working in Senckenberg with Sesam and Orthoptera anymore...
I found a Letana atomifera holotype here http://sesam.senckenberg.de/page/index.asp?objekt_id=794321&sprache_kurz=en
It would be interesting to crosscheck these data all DORSA specimens are photographed