Complex for Tetrix bipunctata

[SeanCozart]

See https://www.inaturalist.org/flags/657018 for discussion

Also a citation using this complex: https://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/68316/

[MMCigliano]

We followed Moser et al. (2021), the most recent study on the Tetrix bipunctata complex https://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/68316/, where the authors recommend that bipunctata and kraussi are considered as separate units until the species question can be answered more precisely.

[SeanCozart]

@MMCigliano To clarify my request; what I would like to see implemented into OSF is the complex T. bipunctata. So I guess that will show up in the database as "Tetrix supersp. bipunctata" with T. bipunctata and kraussi as children taxa. iNaturalist uses the term "complex" instead of "superspecies".

[MMCigliano]

@SeanCozart , it is done. Thank you for your comments

[klausriede]

if we go directly to T. kraussi (for example somebody reading about this species in the literature) https://orthoptera.speciesfile.org/otus/809180/overview it is not clear from this other end that it is "part" of a complex, it would be good to have this info on the T kraussi Taxonpage

[klausriede]

PS: old OSF notges: Moser, H. Baur, A.W. Lehmann & G.U.C. Lehmann. 2021. ZooKeys 1043:33-59 zookeys.pensoft.net >> Note: unclear whether young species or infraspecific ecomorph of T. bipunctata >> Tetrix kraussi - it would be helpful to see these notes in TP

[MMCigliano]

Klaus, you can see the citations' notes under Browse Nomenclature in TW https://sfg.taxonworks.org/tasks/nomenclature/browse?taxon_name_id=916728

[klausriede]

but I think it is important to inform outsiders accessing TP! TPs are OSFs window into the world, and non taxonomists will not login into TW