Open sempervictus opened 9 months ago
Hello RageLtMan,
RageLtMan:
fs/aufs/opts.c:673:3: error: fallthrough annotation does not directly precede switch label fallthrough; ^ ::: which appears to be happening because of the
add:
label below the fallthrough in:671 case Opt_prepend: 672 opt->add.bindex = 0; 673 fallthrough; 674 add: /* indented label */ 675 case Opt_add
is there some sort of annotation needed to make this work or formatting of the label to make Clang happy?
Thanks for the report. Since I don't use clang usually i'm not aware of that.
What will happen if you switch the line 674 and 675?
J. R. Okajima
That's what i ended up doing too
commit 13e220c996fe2205c020ad4ca056acac183eb611
Author: RageLtMan <rageltman [at] sempervictus>
Date: Sun Feb 18 12:17:06 2024 -0500
AUFS: move label
diff --git a/fs/aufs/opts.c b/fs/aufs/opts.c
index 20421440c004..1628137da28b 100644
--- a/fs/aufs/opts.c
+++ b/fs/aufs/opts.c
@@ -671,8 +671,8 @@ static int au_opt_br(struct super_block *sb, struct au_opt *opt,
case Opt_prepend:
opt->add.bindex = 0;
fallthrough;
- add: /* indented label */
case Opt_add:
+ add: /* indented label */
err = au_br_add(sb, &opt->add,
au_ftest_opts(opts->flags, REMOUNT));
if (!err) {
RageLtMan:
That's what i ended up doing too
Ok, I will pick it up into aufs6.1 and spread all other branches. Thanks.
J. R. Okajima
------- Blind-Carbon-Copy
From: "J. R. Okajima" @.> To: @. Subject: aufs6 GIT release (v6.8-rc5) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: @.> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 04:42:07 +0900 Message-ID: @.>
This is a minor release. There is no change in aufs behaviour.
J. R. Okajima
------- End of Blind-Carbon-Copy
Building 6.6.4 with clang, i'm seeing:
which appears to be happening because of the
add:
label below the fallthrough in:is there some sort of annotation needed to make this work or formatting of the label to make Clang happy?