Closed fietew closed 8 years ago
Cool, that looks much simpler.
Could you maybe change (nxs(1)*x+nxs(2)*y+nxs(3)*z)) to (nxs(1).*x+nxs(2).*y+nxs(3).*z)) to make it even more obvious what is giong on.
(nxs(1)*x+nxs(2)*y+nxs(3)*z))
(nxs(1).*x+nxs(2).*y+nxs(3).*z))
Cool, that looks much simpler.