search

sftcd / wkesni

A well-known URI for publishing ESNIKeys
7 stars 2 forks source link

Use a more general approach #3

Closed bemasc closed 1 year ago

bemasc commented 1 year ago

This design can handle ECH configurations in a wider variety of architectures, and is extensible to future origin configuration needs as well.

bemasc commented 1 year ago

@sftcd @richsalz IIRC we agreed to try out a design that could represent aliases, so here you go. I know this is a big change with two weekdays until the draft deadline, so it's OK if we can't get it out in time, but I figured I would try.

sftcd commented 1 year ago

I'm not sure whether or not I like that approach, however it is entirely fair to ask the WG if they prefer the highly specific one from -00 or this more generic one in -01.

I'd say just add in some text like that, e.g. maybe "This version proposes changing from the highly ECHConfig specific approach of -00 to a much more generic approach - the authors are including this as a way to get feedback from the WG as to which of these approaches may be more likely to garner rough consensus. (IOW) If the WG feel this is worse than -00 we're fine with reverting."

Maybe whack something like that into the abstract or the early intro so's it's noticeable?

Cheers, S.

sftcd commented 1 year ago

On 20/10/2022 22:12, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:

can inform

  • its authoritative DNS server

Is "it's" really correct? Not in the original use case where the web origin is the public name talking to the ZF of the backend. I see that's better nuanced in the text but maybe s/it's/an/

S.

bemasc commented 1 year ago

I'd say just add in some text like that, e.g. maybe "This version proposes changing from the highly ECHConfig specific approach of -00 to a much more generic approach - the authors are including this as a way to get feedback from the WG as to which of these approaches may be more likely to garner rough consensus. (IOW) If the WG feel this is worse than -00 we're fine with reverting."

Done

maybe s/it's/an/

Done

sftcd commented 1 year ago

On 20/10/2022 22:23, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:

I'd say just add in some text like that, e.g. maybe "This version proposes changing from the highly ECHConfig specific approach of -00 to a much more generic approach - the authors are including this as a way to get feedback from the WG as to which of these approaches may be more likely to garner rough consensus. (IOW) If the WG feel this is worse than -00 we're fine with reverting."

Done

Cool. With that included, I'm fine with hitting the publish button if you want. If I need to do it 'cause I'm adding you folks I can do it tomorrow or over the w/e.

S

maybe s/it's/an/

Done