Open jpcima opened 4 years ago
Sorry, I "edited" it by mistake but not changed anything, like a "I'm a simple man, I see a checkbox and I select it." :-P If I can put my cent on it that sounds like the way I use to code except:
_
suffix, which I agree but still about personal taste (e.g. also as prefix or m_
prefixedbad doc comment
and I never understand why automatic Doxygen editors puts all those unneeded asterisks where starting with an indentation looks more clean and readable to me, but this is also (my) personal tasteDespite the 2 personal points above all of that makes sense to me.
I'm okay with all this, I have no strong opinions. I tend to prefix with _ in python but I'm flexible :)
I also think we could pimpl everything if you wish. One thing that we may discuss is the Impl& impl = *impl_;
that you put in the parent calls: what's the reason?
I tend to prefix with _
The prefix _
is reserved for compilers.
what's the reason?
It's for no other reason than to help the compiler, writing such a this as impl_->x
dereferences twice.
Added an item regarding the include file order, see the top comment
A few ideas, all open to discussion
sfz::
everywhere ie.namespace sfz { [...] } // namespace sfz
_
suffix, to make it evident when we're deferencingthis
Defaults.h
#include "ADSREnvelope.cpp"
inFloatEnvelopes.cpp
Edit:
unistd.h
)