search

sg16-unicode / sg16

SG16 overview and general information
46 stars 5 forks source link

Reserving rights for formatting specifiers in SD-8 #73

Open cor3ntin opened 3 years ago

cor3ntin commented 3 years ago

We need a paper to update SD8 such that we make it clear we can

ThePhD commented 3 years ago

This is a good idea, but this is a LEWG/LWG issue, not a SG-16 one. This should be raised with those groups.

steve-downey commented 3 years ago

I agree also.

In addition, though, for compile time things that expand as templates, we need a concrete mechanism in mind. While we don't specify implementation techniques of the library, we need to make sure it's implementable.

This probably can be done with inline namespaces for something like format or any CTRE.

I think printf and friends already reserve %* in their grammar?

On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 2:10 PM The Phantom Derpstorm < @.***> wrote:

This is a good idea, but this is a LEWG/LWG issue, not a SG-16 one. This should be raised with those groups.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16/issues/73#issuecomment-829478214, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAVNZ5VDM6KGTOAN3WCGOOTTLGOHVANCNFSM43Z2S7QQ .