Open jalaziz opened 3 years ago
One of the sources of confusion is when you run ldd, it would appear that libz is available
Which ldd
are you running? The version from this package or one elsewhere in your operating system? It's not clear from this comment.
One of the sources of confusion is when you run ldd, it would appear that libz is available
Which
ldd
are you running? The version from this package or one elsewhere in your operating system? It's not clear from this comment.
Apologies, ldd
from alpine. The image I was testing the issue on didn't have the bin
package installed. I'm presuming that was an additional source of confusion for me. When comparing ldd
output of different binaries, I saw some pointed to /lib/ld-musl-x86_64.so.1
, which led me to believe /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
meant it was pointed at this package. That was stupid in hindsight.
That was then compounded by noticing that libz
was missing and then trying to install zlib
using apk
to no avail. Again, in hindsight, I should've realized that wouldn't have possibly worked.
However, given that it seems other have made a similar mistake, maybe the solution can be simpler?
No worries and thanks for the additional context! I have just realised that while I worked on creating a glibc-zlib
package for this exact use case (specifically in this commit), I never got around to releasing it. 🤦
I'll correct that by releasing the additional package later today. I think that'll be the easiest way to make this process simpler.
This would did help me bigtime as well - thanks!
I realized that I needed to install the regular apk
AND the bin apk
.
I realize this has been asked before in #75, but I'm creating this issue for two reasons:
75 does not directly mention zlib, so this may help others discover the issue.
While not all glibc-compiled binaries require zlib, it does seem to be a somewhat common dependency and it's a bit of a gotcha when trying to run on Alpine.
One of the sources of confusion is when you run
ldd
, it would appear that libz is available:I personally ran into this issue not due to OpenJDK, but rather from trying to run a PyInstaller-based Python "binary".
While the solution of grabbing zlib from Archi Linux seems to work, it would be nice to be able to download a compatible version of zlib alongside the glibc package.
While I'm happy to give it a try myself, if there's any appetite for it to be included in this repo, that would be preferred as it would ease discovery.