There's argument for explicitly saying that VCF Zarr is a draft specification, making it clear that we see this as a starting point for further refinement and ultimately (in the ideal situation) standardisation. I don't know how explicit we want to be about this, though.
There's argument for explicitly saying that VCF Zarr is a draft specification, making it clear that we see this as a starting point for further refinement and ultimately (in the ideal situation) standardisation. I don't know how explicit we want to be about this, though.
Thoughts?