LCS in "Add base shape"

[free777cat]

it will be more convenient

• 

[free777cat]

Please change the LCS position. It interferes a lot with the design.

[free777cat]

This LCS position nullifies all the advantages of using the "Add base shape" function

[shaise]

I do not understand your request. Some people like the LCS on the side, some in the center. If I put it in the center someone else will say it is better on the side.

[free777cat]

When designing, the base of symmetrical parts is always in the center. Thus, the model can immediately be used in "Assembly". It's not just "people like", it's an engineering way.

[free777cat]

If the "Bend side" parameter is added, it does not correlate at all with the lateral position.

[shaise]

I can understand the reasoning of putting LCS in the symmetrical center. But from your image you want it to be at the Celter-Left, What about Center-Center or Center-Right?

[free777cat]

It would be a good idea to start with LCS1. And add the following functions in the editor. It will be great!!! (LCS2 mid plane)

[shaise]

OK. Best thing is to let the user choose origin location. I have added this option. It should also work on previously generated base shapes, if you recompute them.

[free777cat]

You still need to add "invert". Then all options will be available.

[shaise]

What do you mean by invert? so the u shape is along Y instead of along X?

[free777cat]

[shaise]

Sorry but I do not see a reason for that. You can just rotate the part. This will just over complicate the tool.

[free777cat]

Is it possible to make the "negative" value work? "invert"

[free777cat]

location ICONs super !!!