Closed justin808 closed 8 years ago
@justin808 that's a one-time problem, though, right? We should be good from now on? And I think two tags for the same thing is silly, just stick with the one tag. It's clearer and simpler. KISS!
Tags -- probably -- was caused by us doing a test...
In terms of tags using v or not, one way is the rubygem way and one way is the npm way. Please confirm which way we should go and update the Changelog and delete the unused tags.
CC: @alexfedoseev @samnang
@justin808 So I'm looking at the release-it
api and I'm not sure that I can even turn the tagging thing off like we can with the gem-release
library. So that would kind of force our hand into using the npm
style.
release-it: https://www.npmjs.com/package/release-it gem-release: https://github.com/svenfuchs/gem-release
We'll put this one on ice for now. Not critical.
@justin808 @robwise @alexfedoseev I thought bundler already provide rake task helpers in gem development process http://bundler.io/v1.11/bundle_gem.html. I vote for tagging with v
prefix because this project is more about ruby side than js side.
@robwise
Alternately, we can dry up the tags and decide on either:
Full output below.