Closed charles-plessy closed 6 years ago
Bonjour Charles,
I think for now, the points to focus on are the accessibility and documentation of the package. Connecting to the GenomicRange object is a good step. I really think that using S4 objects and their methods is a good way to increase reproducibility in the processing of the data. I agree with the idea of droping the 'not standard' genes/libs table.
How about using the dedicated methods for the manipulation of the SummerizedExperiment object inside Vizection ? It can be long work for now but a strength for later if there are new contributors.
Thanks
Bonjour Simon,
these "genes" and "libs" were just a clumsy attempt to reach what the authors of the SummarizedExperiment package did much better.
I think that it would be great for Vizection to at least support SummarizedExperiment objects natively, and perhaps even later drop support for genes/libs table (in favor of explaining how to make a SummarizedExperiment with them).
This pull request lets Vizection load a
SummarizedExperiment
, and then internally turn it into genes/libs tables. Had I more time, I would have liked to make deeper changes where Vizection's functions would use the SE object directly via thecolData
andassay
functions...What do you think about it ?