shana / google-highly-open-participation-mono

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/google-highly-open-participation-mono
0 stars 0 forks source link

Find open source .Net apps for testing #22

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Scour the popular open-source sites for applications we can use for 
testing Mono.

For example:
http://www.codeproject.com
http://www.codeplex.com
http://www.sourceforge.net

These can be apps that:
- Show some deficiencies in our implementation and can be used as test 
cases.  Some examples can be seen at http://www.mono-
project.com/Winforms_Samples.
- Applications that do run well and would be useful for us package for 
people to run on Mono/Linux.  Some examples can be seen at http://www.mono-
project.com/InfrastructureProjects#Ongoing_Maintenance_of_third_party_compo
nents.

Deliverables:
A MediaWiki page that includes a name of the application, a link to it, a 
summary of what the application does, and its status for working on Mono.  
The status for Mono can be checked using MoMA (http://www.mono-
project.com/MoMA).  If few or no problems are reported by MoMA, try 
running it on Mono.  (The biggest non-portability problem are P/Inokves 
reported by MoMA, if the app has more than 10-15, don't worry about it.)

Original issue reported on code.google.com by jpo...@gmail.com on 27 Nov 2007 at 4:20

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I claim this task.

Original comment by luke321...@gmail.com on 28 Nov 2007 at 1:20

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by jpo...@gmail.com on 3 Dec 2007 at 5:45

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
You can test some of Mono's ASP.Net implementation with 
http://www.subversionreports.org/

Original comment by rthijs...@gmail.com on 7 Dec 2007 at 9:12

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
It has been two weeks since this task was claimed, please provide an update or 
I will
open it back up so that someone else can attempt it.  Thanks!

Original comment by jpo...@gmail.com on 13 Dec 2007 at 3:50

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Opening this task back up.

Original comment by jpo...@gmail.com on 14 Dec 2007 at 5:04

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I claim this task

Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com on 17 Dec 2007 at 9:42

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
How many examples do you need?

Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com on 17 Dec 2007 at 9:58

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I think 10 is a fair number.

Original comment by jpo...@gmail.com on 17 Dec 2007 at 10:10

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
(And of course they can't be ones listed on the pages in the description, they 
need
to be new ones!)

Original comment by jpo...@gmail.com on 17 Dec 2007 at 10:10

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I have a question.  I have put an application through MoMA, and it generated a 
list
of errors.  How do I know whether I should submit it?  The parts it failed on 
include
P/Invokes into native code, Methods called that throw NotImplementedException, 
and
Methods called marked with [MonoTodo].

One more thing.  I am just trying to make sure I understand what you are 
looking for.
 You want applications that do poorly, and applications that pass with flying colors?

Also, all of the above applications must be useful.  Am I correct, or did I
misunderstand something?

Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com on 17 Dec 2007 at 11:28

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
You can always submit it, but you probably need to also save the html file it
generates and post it somewhere (or put them all in a zip at the end and attach 
it to
this task).

Pretty much any non-trivial application is fine, whether it does good or 
poorly.  We
can use poor ones to improve Mono, and we can use good ones to showcase Mono. 
Non-trivial just means an actual useful open-source application, not like a 10 
line
example program.

Something kinda like this: http://www.mono-project.com/Moonlight_1.0_TestSites, 
but
for desktop applications, and with links to the MoMA results.

Original comment by jpo...@gmail.com on 18 Dec 2007 at 12:04

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Here's one.  Notepad .NET, a notepad replacement. (it looks nice, and it has a 
office
2007 ribbon look-alike)  <http://sourceforge.net/projects/notepaddotnet/>

Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com on 20 Dec 2007 at 2:47

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Here's another.  This monitors network bandwidth.  It's called FreeMeter. 
<http://sourceforge.net/projects/freemeter/>

Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com on 20 Dec 2007 at 2:50

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Feed Launch .NET - feed creator and feed editor for both RSS 2.0 and ATOM 1.0 
feeds.
Nice, clean interface. Preview feeds or save them on the hard disk.  Looks very 
nice.
 <http://sourceforge.net/projects/feedlaunch/>.

Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com on 20 Dec 2007 at 2:55

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Sorry, all of the above applications have problems reported with MoMA.

Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com on 20 Dec 2007 at 2:56

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I found one that MoMA says is completely compatible.  It is a blackjack game -
Sindy's Blackjack.  <http://sourceforge.net/projects/bfsblackjack/>

Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com on 20 Dec 2007 at 3:03

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Is beta all right, or is it too buggy to be used to test Mono?

Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com on 20 Dec 2007 at 3:41

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
XML Notepad 2007.  Not in beta.  MoMA got errors on every part.  You can get it 
from
<http://www.codeplex.com/xmlnotepad>.

Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com on 20 Dec 2007 at 3:48

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
What Sindy's Blackjack and XML Notepad 2007 do are said in the titles.  I 
thought it
was pretty self-explanatory.  I would have edited the comment, but I can't do 
that.

Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com on 20 Dec 2007 at 3:56

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Sandcastle Help File Builder.  It is not in beta.  MoMA also got errors on every
part.  You can get it at <http://www.codeplex.com/SHFB>.  It is used to make 
Help Files.

Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com on 20 Dec 2007 at 3:56

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Beta is fine if it still has significant functionality.  Like gmail is a 
'beta', but
its still a pretty complete email client.  ;-)

Original comment by jpo...@gmail.com on 20 Dec 2007 at 4:20

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
This is #7 - PassKeeper.  This is a beta.  It failed on two of the categories.  
It
stores passwords in an encrypted database. <http://www.codeplex.com/passkeeper>

Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com on 20 Dec 2007 at 8:37

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
XML Explorer is a lightweight XML file viewer. It supports multiple document 
tabs,
and support for middle-clicking to close tabs. It can handle extremely large XML
files (or so it says).  This is not a beta.  It failed in two categories. 
<http://www.codeplex.com/xmlexplorer>.  #8.

Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com on 20 Dec 2007 at 8:42

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I never realized how few .NET open source applications there are.  I barely got 
8,
and I had to include betas!

Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com on 20 Dec 2007 at 8:52

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Calculator .NET.  It is a replacement for the windows calculator, comes with 
extra
features.  Not a bad layout.  Not a beta.  It uses .NET 3.5 (the latest 
version). 
MoMA says it works perfectly. <http://code.google.com/p/calculator/>  

Also, there is a simple timer.  It is not a beta.  It doesn't really have a 
name.  It
failed all categories of MoMA.  Simple & easy to use. 
<http://code.google.com/p/simple-timer/>

Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com on 20 Dec 2007 at 10:07

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Is this enough?

Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com on 20 Dec 2007 at 10:07

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Yeah.  Thanks for your research!  Marking task as completed.

Original comment by jpo...@gmail.com on 20 Dec 2007 at 10:43