Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
I claim this task.
Original comment by luke321...@gmail.com
on 28 Nov 2007 at 1:20
Original comment by jpo...@gmail.com
on 3 Dec 2007 at 5:45
You can test some of Mono's ASP.Net implementation with
http://www.subversionreports.org/
Original comment by rthijs...@gmail.com
on 7 Dec 2007 at 9:12
It has been two weeks since this task was claimed, please provide an update or
I will
open it back up so that someone else can attempt it. Thanks!
Original comment by jpo...@gmail.com
on 13 Dec 2007 at 3:50
Opening this task back up.
Original comment by jpo...@gmail.com
on 14 Dec 2007 at 5:04
I claim this task
Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com
on 17 Dec 2007 at 9:42
How many examples do you need?
Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com
on 17 Dec 2007 at 9:58
I think 10 is a fair number.
Original comment by jpo...@gmail.com
on 17 Dec 2007 at 10:10
(And of course they can't be ones listed on the pages in the description, they
need
to be new ones!)
Original comment by jpo...@gmail.com
on 17 Dec 2007 at 10:10
I have a question. I have put an application through MoMA, and it generated a
list
of errors. How do I know whether I should submit it? The parts it failed on
include
P/Invokes into native code, Methods called that throw NotImplementedException,
and
Methods called marked with [MonoTodo].
One more thing. I am just trying to make sure I understand what you are
looking for.
You want applications that do poorly, and applications that pass with flying colors?
Also, all of the above applications must be useful. Am I correct, or did I
misunderstand something?
Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com
on 17 Dec 2007 at 11:28
You can always submit it, but you probably need to also save the html file it
generates and post it somewhere (or put them all in a zip at the end and attach
it to
this task).
Pretty much any non-trivial application is fine, whether it does good or
poorly. We
can use poor ones to improve Mono, and we can use good ones to showcase Mono.
Non-trivial just means an actual useful open-source application, not like a 10
line
example program.
Something kinda like this: http://www.mono-project.com/Moonlight_1.0_TestSites,
but
for desktop applications, and with links to the MoMA results.
Original comment by jpo...@gmail.com
on 18 Dec 2007 at 12:04
Here's one. Notepad .NET, a notepad replacement. (it looks nice, and it has a
office
2007 ribbon look-alike) <http://sourceforge.net/projects/notepaddotnet/>
Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com
on 20 Dec 2007 at 2:47
Attachments:
Here's another. This monitors network bandwidth. It's called FreeMeter.
<http://sourceforge.net/projects/freemeter/>
Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com
on 20 Dec 2007 at 2:50
Attachments:
Feed Launch .NET - feed creator and feed editor for both RSS 2.0 and ATOM 1.0
feeds.
Nice, clean interface. Preview feeds or save them on the hard disk. Looks very
nice.
<http://sourceforge.net/projects/feedlaunch/>.
Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com
on 20 Dec 2007 at 2:55
Attachments:
Sorry, all of the above applications have problems reported with MoMA.
Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com
on 20 Dec 2007 at 2:56
I found one that MoMA says is completely compatible. It is a blackjack game -
Sindy's Blackjack. <http://sourceforge.net/projects/bfsblackjack/>
Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com
on 20 Dec 2007 at 3:03
Is beta all right, or is it too buggy to be used to test Mono?
Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com
on 20 Dec 2007 at 3:41
XML Notepad 2007. Not in beta. MoMA got errors on every part. You can get it
from
<http://www.codeplex.com/xmlnotepad>.
Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com
on 20 Dec 2007 at 3:48
Attachments:
What Sindy's Blackjack and XML Notepad 2007 do are said in the titles. I
thought it
was pretty self-explanatory. I would have edited the comment, but I can't do
that.
Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com
on 20 Dec 2007 at 3:56
Sandcastle Help File Builder. It is not in beta. MoMA also got errors on every
part. You can get it at <http://www.codeplex.com/SHFB>. It is used to make
Help Files.
Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com
on 20 Dec 2007 at 3:56
Attachments:
Beta is fine if it still has significant functionality. Like gmail is a
'beta', but
its still a pretty complete email client. ;-)
Original comment by jpo...@gmail.com
on 20 Dec 2007 at 4:20
This is #7 - PassKeeper. This is a beta. It failed on two of the categories.
It
stores passwords in an encrypted database. <http://www.codeplex.com/passkeeper>
Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com
on 20 Dec 2007 at 8:37
Attachments:
XML Explorer is a lightweight XML file viewer. It supports multiple document
tabs,
and support for middle-clicking to close tabs. It can handle extremely large XML
files (or so it says). This is not a beta. It failed in two categories.
<http://www.codeplex.com/xmlexplorer>. #8.
Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com
on 20 Dec 2007 at 8:42
Attachments:
I never realized how few .NET open source applications there are. I barely got
8,
and I had to include betas!
Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com
on 20 Dec 2007 at 8:52
Calculator .NET. It is a replacement for the windows calculator, comes with
extra
features. Not a bad layout. Not a beta. It uses .NET 3.5 (the latest
version).
MoMA says it works perfectly. <http://code.google.com/p/calculator/>
Also, there is a simple timer. It is not a beta. It doesn't really have a
name. It
failed all categories of MoMA. Simple & easy to use.
<http://code.google.com/p/simple-timer/>
Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com
on 20 Dec 2007 at 10:07
Attachments:
Is this enough?
Original comment by eric.k....@gmail.com
on 20 Dec 2007 at 10:07
Yeah. Thanks for your research! Marking task as completed.
Original comment by jpo...@gmail.com
on 20 Dec 2007 at 10:43
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jpo...@gmail.com
on 27 Nov 2007 at 4:20