gomesalexandre
commented
2 hours ago Closing as this isn't a bug - different wallets use different derivation paths for accounts 0+, this is the state of internet chains. More details in https://discord.com/channels/554694662431178782/1299096396108136549/1299098236111294494
Overview
Reported in Support and recreated by Ops:
The first address (0th address) is derived with 44'/931'/0'/0/0 which is correct.
Other tools increment the index# (last digit) when deriving additional addresses: 44'/931'/0'/0/1 44'/931'/0'/0/2 44'/931'/0'/0/3 but it seems ShapeShift is incrementing the account number instead:
44'/931'/1'/0/0 44'/931'/2'/0/0 44'/931'/3'/0/0 This creates an inconsistency between how ShapeShift works vs how all other tools work.
If a user creates a 2nd address on any other tool, and then tries to use that address on ShapeShift, they'll think the funds are gone.
Similarly, if someone creates a 2nd address on ShapeShift but then tries to use any other tool, they won't find their funds there either
References and additional details
https://jam.dev/c/33665cda-3e4e-4b77-a518-4c5175803bcf See the difference^
Acceptance Criteria
ShapeShift uses the proper account derivation index incrementation.
Need By Date
No response
Screenshots/Mockups
No response
Estimated effort
No response