Just installed fd from the latest .deb release packages, and it installs under the name fd, not fdfind.
It's not really an issue but a note about this could be added to the readme, under the ubuntu / debian sections, and/or actually rename fd to fdind in the .deb package so there is indeed no conflict between names when a user wants to install fdclone (or have it already installed).
(Note: On my system, fdclone wasn't installed, so no command with the name fd existed. )
Before installation
$ fd
Command 'fd' not found, but can be installed with:
sudo apt install fdclone
$ fdfind
Command 'fdfind' not found, but can be installed with:
sudo apt install fd-find
After
$ sudo dpkg -i fd_10.1.0_amd64.deb
$ fdfind
Command 'fdfind' not found, but can be installed with:
sudo apt install fd-find
$ which fd
/usr/bin/fd
$ fd --version
fd 10.1.0
As a test to see if that would cause conflicts with fdclone, I tried to installed fdclone as well, but this failed (name conflict).
$ sudo apt install fdclone
dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/fdclone_3.01j-1_amd64.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/fd', which is also in package fd 10.0.0
dpkg-deb: error: paste subprocess was killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/fdclone_3.01j-1_amd64.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
fd version 10.1.0, ubuntu 22.04
Just installed
fd
from the latest.deb
release packages, and it installs under the namefd
, notfdfind
. It's not really an issue but a note about this could be added to the readme, under the ubuntu / debian sections, and/or actually renamefd
tofdind
in the .deb package so there is indeed no conflict between names when a user wants to install fdclone (or have it already installed).(Note: On my system,
fdclone
wasn't installed, so no command with the namefd
existed. )Before installation
After
As a test to see if that would cause conflicts with
fdclone
, I tried to installedfdclone
as well, but this failed (name conflict).