Open shaunlxw opened 4 months ago
We deliberately decided not to include implementation details for these commands as they are largely similar with the markp
command implementation in the DG. Adding implementation details for all commands would add unnecessary clutter and information to the DG with little value added.
Team chose [response.NotInScope
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
To include implementation details for other major features like marka/unmarka, unmarkp, markallp/unmarkallp, markalla/unmarkalla ...