search

shaunlxw / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

DG implementation details missing for some major features #22

Open shaunlxw opened 4 months ago

shaunlxw commented 4 months ago

To include implementation details for other major features like marka/unmarka, unmarkp, markallp/unmarkallp, markalla/unmarkalla ...

nus-se-bot commented 4 months ago

Team's Response

We deliberately decided not to include implementation details for these commands as they are largely similar with the markp command implementation in the DG. Adding implementation details for all commands would add unnecessary clutter and information to the DG with little value added.

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue response

Team chose [response.NotInScope]

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]

## :question: Issue severity Team chose [`severity.VeryLow`] Originally [`severity.Medium`] - [x] I disagree **Reason for disagreement:** Severity should be adjusted to Low instead of VeryLow, since this issue is not purely cosmetic.