Consider adding green caveats to relevant assessment methods (where representative sampling is possible, the whole-of-stock assumption is satisfied)

[serenalomonico]

Old team note: if users have answered “yes” to the monitoring question whereby data is considered to be representative even if sampling <100% of the stock, then this should imply that concerns around whole-of-stock assessment assumptions can be overcome. Reply by ND: "Perhaps this needs to invoke a green caveat in the Assessment section against relevant assessments stating that, as representative sampling is possible, the whole-of-stock assumption is satisfied. We’d have to be careful about question wording, though, to make sure that we are asking about stock representativeness, as opposed for (e.g. fishing activity representativeness."

[shcaba]

The easiest way would be to find the methods that currently trigger non-green caveats and give them a green if they do have representative samples.

[bsnouffer]

related to #147