shdqcdsn / counterclockwise

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/counterclockwise
0 stars 0 forks source link

Defect standalone product for master branch #665

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Download 
http://updatesite.ccw-ide.org/branch/master/CI0126-master-git4c56fa0/products/Co
unterclockwise-0.29.1-SNAPSHOT-linux.gtk.x86_64.zip
2. Unzip
3. Start Counterclockwise in the extracted directory

A completely empty window is shown with window caption 
"%trimmedwindow.label.eclipseSDK" (without any visible GUI controls).

No logfile can be found in the newly created workspace.

Console output:
$ ./Counterclockwise 
CCWPlugin instanciated
CCWPlugin.start: ENTER
CCWPlugin.start: EXIT
log/info: CCW Model Processor called.
clojure.osgi: initFactory(ccw.core.factories/handler-factory) - START
clojure.osgi: namespace clojure.core loaded
clojure.osgi: Namespace ccw.core.factories loaded from bundle ccw.core
clojure.osgi: initFactory(ccw.core.factories/handler-factory) - STOP
clojure.osgi: GenericExecutableExtension.create() - with factory: 
#'ccw.core.factories/handler-factory
ccw.leiningen.classpath-container before ns decl
clojure.osgi: Namespace paredit.static-analysis loaded from bundle ccw.core
ccw.jdt load starts
ccw.jdt namespace loaded
ccw.leiningen.util load starts
util namespace loaded
ccw.leiningen.classpath-container load starts
classpath-container namespace loaded
ccw.leiningen.nature load starts
ccw.leiningen.nature namespace loaded
ccw.leiningen.handlers load starts
ccw.leiningen.handlers namespace loaded
clojure.osgi: GenericExecutableExtension.create() - factory: 
#'ccw.core.factories/handler-factory returned

Original issue reported on code.google.com by Gunnar.V...@googlemail.com on 21 Oct 2014 at 10:27

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
The same happens when launching ccw.core as Eclipse application except that the 
window caption shows "Eclipse SDK".

Original comment by Gunnar.V...@googlemail.com on 22 Oct 2014 at 10:32

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Some builds of the standalone product have indeed been unstable while I was 
attempting to upgrade it to eclipse Luna. 

I expect the last push / build to be stable, though. Is it not the case for you 
? (Maybe you had no chance and grabbed one of the intermediate state builds ?)

Original comment by laurent....@gmail.com on 25 Oct 2014 at 12:12

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I tried from my laptop again and CCW started as expected. So no defect here.

It is weird that the error scenario was the same when launching from latest 
commit on master (Build 126 at that time).

Original comment by Gunnar.V...@googlemail.com on 26 Oct 2014 at 11:07

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Back on the work computer, I downloaded CCW Build 126 from [1] again.
To avoid downloading the same possibly corrupt archive because of caching I 
used a different browser for the download.
The extracted CCW has the same problems again (as before on this computer).

I am using Java 7 on Linux Mint 17.

[1] 
http://updatesite.ccw-ide.org/branch/master/CI0126-master-git4c56fa0/products/Co
unterclockwise-0.29.1-SNAPSHOT-linux.gtk.x86_64.zip

Original comment by Gunnar.V...@googlemail.com on 27 Oct 2014 at 4:52

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Still have no idea why it would not work on your linux box.

I pushed some content, they will trigger a new build. My secret hope is that 
this new build will work correctly for you :-)

Original comment by laurent....@gmail.com on 6 Nov 2014 at 2:40

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Same problem on the work pc with 
http://updatesite.ccw-ide.org/branch/master/CI0133-master-git9344105/products/Co
unterclockwise-0.29.1-SNAPSHOT-linux.gtk.x86_64.zip

Are there any environment settings I should verify?

Original comment by Gunnar.V...@googlemail.com on 10 Nov 2014 at 1:49

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I still have no idea. This is weird and frightening. Could this be a problem 
with versions of SWT / GTK 2/3 ?
No interesting indication in the workspace's .metadata/.log file?

I haven't tried on Linux Mint, maybe I should.

Does a "raw" Eclipse without CCW installed on it work better? If so, is the 
addition of CCW as a plugin what would cause the instability if you try ?

Original comment by laurent....@gmail.com on 10 Nov 2014 at 9:50

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I got a working setup on my work pc by manual installation:
(1) Install 64 bit Eclipse Luna SR1
(2) Install CCW via updatesite http://updatesite.ccw-ide.org/branch/master/

Original comment by Gunnar.V...@googlemail.com on 11 Nov 2014 at 1:21

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
So it's a problem with the Standalone version?

Original comment by laurent....@gmail.com on 12 Nov 2014 at 10:24

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by laurent....@gmail.com on 13 Nov 2014 at 1:54

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Definitely, yes.

Original comment by Gunnar.V...@googlemail.com on 14 Nov 2014 at 11:18

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I'm really sorry I didn't take this issue more seriously before. I think I 
hoped its was just a problem with your configuration. And since it was working 
on OSX, 

Anyway, I was able to reproduce it and will work on it ASAP 

Original comment by laurent....@gmail.com on 14 Nov 2014 at 4:06

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
So once I was trying to solve this, I also took the opportunity to switch to 
Luna and also reworked the CCW/Standalone build scripts.

The master branch now reflects these changes.
Downloading the standalone product and installing it in a Ubuntu 14.10 box 
inside VirtualBox worked for me. What about you?

Original comment by laurent....@gmail.com on 15 Nov 2014 at 11:45

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Great. The latest master standalone product [1] starts just fine.
Good job! :)

[1] 
http://updatesite.ccw-ide.org/branch/master/CI0153-master-gitd17b825/products/Co
unterclockwise-0.29.2-SNAPSHOT-linux.gtk.x86_64.zip

Original comment by Gunnar.V...@googlemail.com on 17 Nov 2014 at 12:30

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I did notice that you announced 0.29.2 on the mailing list but the update site 
only has 0.29.0. Is that intended?

Original comment by Gunnar.V...@googlemail.com on 17 Nov 2014 at 12:32

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Well, 0.29.1 has been released too early. I did lots of changes to fix the 
standalone product.

I will release a 0.30.0 later this week, leaving 0.29.x behind.

Original comment by laurent....@gmail.com on 17 Nov 2014 at 1:30

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by laurent....@gmail.com on 18 Nov 2014 at 9:17

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by laurent....@gmail.com on 20 Nov 2014 at 3:42