Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
The same happens when launching ccw.core as Eclipse application except that the
window caption shows "Eclipse SDK".
Original comment by Gunnar.V...@googlemail.com
on 22 Oct 2014 at 10:32
Some builds of the standalone product have indeed been unstable while I was
attempting to upgrade it to eclipse Luna.
I expect the last push / build to be stable, though. Is it not the case for you
? (Maybe you had no chance and grabbed one of the intermediate state builds ?)
Original comment by laurent....@gmail.com
on 25 Oct 2014 at 12:12
I tried from my laptop again and CCW started as expected. So no defect here.
It is weird that the error scenario was the same when launching from latest
commit on master (Build 126 at that time).
Original comment by Gunnar.V...@googlemail.com
on 26 Oct 2014 at 11:07
Back on the work computer, I downloaded CCW Build 126 from [1] again.
To avoid downloading the same possibly corrupt archive because of caching I
used a different browser for the download.
The extracted CCW has the same problems again (as before on this computer).
I am using Java 7 on Linux Mint 17.
[1]
http://updatesite.ccw-ide.org/branch/master/CI0126-master-git4c56fa0/products/Co
unterclockwise-0.29.1-SNAPSHOT-linux.gtk.x86_64.zip
Original comment by Gunnar.V...@googlemail.com
on 27 Oct 2014 at 4:52
Still have no idea why it would not work on your linux box.
I pushed some content, they will trigger a new build. My secret hope is that
this new build will work correctly for you :-)
Original comment by laurent....@gmail.com
on 6 Nov 2014 at 2:40
Same problem on the work pc with
http://updatesite.ccw-ide.org/branch/master/CI0133-master-git9344105/products/Co
unterclockwise-0.29.1-SNAPSHOT-linux.gtk.x86_64.zip
Are there any environment settings I should verify?
Original comment by Gunnar.V...@googlemail.com
on 10 Nov 2014 at 1:49
I still have no idea. This is weird and frightening. Could this be a problem
with versions of SWT / GTK 2/3 ?
No interesting indication in the workspace's .metadata/.log file?
I haven't tried on Linux Mint, maybe I should.
Does a "raw" Eclipse without CCW installed on it work better? If so, is the
addition of CCW as a plugin what would cause the instability if you try ?
Original comment by laurent....@gmail.com
on 10 Nov 2014 at 9:50
I got a working setup on my work pc by manual installation:
(1) Install 64 bit Eclipse Luna SR1
(2) Install CCW via updatesite http://updatesite.ccw-ide.org/branch/master/
Original comment by Gunnar.V...@googlemail.com
on 11 Nov 2014 at 1:21
So it's a problem with the Standalone version?
Original comment by laurent....@gmail.com
on 12 Nov 2014 at 10:24
Original comment by laurent....@gmail.com
on 13 Nov 2014 at 1:54
Definitely, yes.
Original comment by Gunnar.V...@googlemail.com
on 14 Nov 2014 at 11:18
I'm really sorry I didn't take this issue more seriously before. I think I
hoped its was just a problem with your configuration. And since it was working
on OSX,
Anyway, I was able to reproduce it and will work on it ASAP
Original comment by laurent....@gmail.com
on 14 Nov 2014 at 4:06
So once I was trying to solve this, I also took the opportunity to switch to
Luna and also reworked the CCW/Standalone build scripts.
The master branch now reflects these changes.
Downloading the standalone product and installing it in a Ubuntu 14.10 box
inside VirtualBox worked for me. What about you?
Original comment by laurent....@gmail.com
on 15 Nov 2014 at 11:45
Great. The latest master standalone product [1] starts just fine.
Good job! :)
[1]
http://updatesite.ccw-ide.org/branch/master/CI0153-master-gitd17b825/products/Co
unterclockwise-0.29.2-SNAPSHOT-linux.gtk.x86_64.zip
Original comment by Gunnar.V...@googlemail.com
on 17 Nov 2014 at 12:30
I did notice that you announced 0.29.2 on the mailing list but the update site
only has 0.29.0. Is that intended?
Original comment by Gunnar.V...@googlemail.com
on 17 Nov 2014 at 12:32
Well, 0.29.1 has been released too early. I did lots of changes to fix the
standalone product.
I will release a 0.30.0 later this week, leaving 0.29.x behind.
Original comment by laurent....@gmail.com
on 17 Nov 2014 at 1:30
Original comment by laurent....@gmail.com
on 18 Nov 2014 at 9:17
Original comment by laurent....@gmail.com
on 20 Nov 2014 at 3:42
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
Gunnar.V...@googlemail.com
on 21 Oct 2014 at 10:27