I'm using the definition of resident as per Section 250(5) of the NYS Vehicle and Traffic Law. Requiring a Bitlicense for anyone who conducts business with someone who is currently located in the state of NY is overbearing

shea256 / proposed-bitlicense-regulations

The Proposed BitLicense Regulations for The State of New York (Thanks to Patrick Murck for the idea + support to convert this to markdown)

28 stars 18 forks source link

I'm using the definition of resident as per Section 250(5) of the NYS Vehicle and Traffic Law. Requiring a Bitlicense for anyone who conducts business with someone who is currently located in the state of NY is overbearing #15

Closed vogelito closed 10 years ago

vogelito commented 10 years ago

Under the current definition, entities would require a bitlicense if their software runs is running on someone's smartphone and they happen to be transferring planes at JFK.

markdavidlamb commented 10 years ago

Yes this makes more sense.

vogelito commented 10 years ago

Closing this pull request for https://github.com/onenameio/proposed-bitlicense-regulations/pull/19