I'm using the definition of resident as per Section 250(5) of the NYS Vehicle and Traffic Law. Requiring a Bitlicense for anyone who conducts business with someone who is currently located in the state of NY is overbearing

shea256 / proposed-bitlicense-regulations

The Proposed BitLicense Regulations for The State of New York (Thanks to Patrick Murck for the idea + support to convert this to markdown)

28 stars 18 forks source link

I'm using the definition of resident as per Section 250(5) of the NYS Vehicle and Traffic Law. Requiring a Bitlicense for anyone who conducts business with someone who is currently located in the state of NY is overbearing #15

Closed vogelito closed 9 years ago

vogelito commented 9 years ago

Under the current definition, entities would require a bitlicense if their software runs is running on someone's smartphone and they happen to be transferring planes at JFK.

markdavidlamb commented 9 years ago

Yes this makes more sense.

vogelito commented 9 years ago

Closing this pull request for https://github.com/onenameio/proposed-bitlicense-regulations/pull/19